ed
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by ed on May 29, 2016 9:15:04 GMT
Stumbled across this the other day circumcisiondecisionmaker.com/decide/ . Seems to be aimed at Americans primarily, as it headlines the procedure, unlike Admin-phimosis-group which aims at supporting education about the condition(s). Nevertheless, with some development it could be quite interesting... "to treat a diagnosed problem" could be added to the "adult" section, for instance, rather than just confining it to infant/child; the Christian religion part could do with referring to Acts 15 (it's central to the shift at that time);and the recommendation for orthodox Jews, only, makes me feel slightly uneasy. What's that all about?
|
|
|
Post by robin on May 29, 2016 22:29:31 GMT
Hi Ed, Firstly I am impressed by the "pop" format of the site and just how many different styles of web-site the anti-circs. have ... we need such snappy short formats .. people dont have time to read these days. your main interest is circumcisiondecisionmaker.com/decide/adult-circumcision/adult-religion/ their recommendation for Jews sort of bumbles along as though they know what they are talking about - but havent actually got anything to say ... i mean the Covenant is rather clear about this !! i thought the Covenant on circ. was the defining start of Judaism? (or was it only part of the deal?) On the updated site (coming soon) i have written at the top of every page "Full circumcision (particularly for infants) is a ridiculous treatment or prevention for any form of phimosis. Those who follow Abraham are asked to please consider using his methods of partial circumcision." i wonder if even this will be abhorent to the anti-circers? And then - though i much appreciate the civil rights issue and the anger of those who were needlessly circd. at birth ... it is unfortunate that anti-circ info. shows so little awareness of foreskin problems : e.g. "The average age of separation allowing full foreskin retraction is ten years. Some foreskins, however, never fully retract–and that, too, is normal." "The average adult’s foreskin is: the most sensitive part of the penis, with 3/4 of its sensitivity" From what I have seen, anti-circ. thinking and info. is still as it was 15 yrs.ago - ------------- what i found fascinating new info .. a list of maybe100 studies back to 1830 - and it shows how incredibly biased PRO circumcision medical thought has been in the past, ... circumcisiondecisionmaker.com/circumcision-facts/history/circ. prevents HIV cancer epilepsy - tuberculosis - urinary and rectal incontinence. masturbation blindness, deafness, and dumbness - alleviates tubercular meningitis and myetitis, and cures brass poisoning, prevents spinal paralysis, prevents cervical cancer in women -- the foreskin causes curvature of the spine, paralysis of the bladder, and clubfoot - however only 3 studies mention phimosis : circumcision prevents spinal paralysis. paralysis from reflex irritation, caused by congenital phimosis and adherent prepuce crossed eyes. Two cases of reflex paraplegia (one with aphasia) from tape-worm and phimosis "frequently necessary for pathological conditions." ... so one study actually says pathological conditions .. so, humm - suppose thats a start thanks for the link ... cheers robin
|
|
ed
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by ed on May 31, 2016 8:10:22 GMT
Thank you for the reply Robin. Wow! That's quite a list! And, yes, Abraham's story could do with studying in greater detail. I feel that the psychology and relationships in it could be really quite instructive and revealing.
|
|
ed
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by ed on May 31, 2016 22:52:32 GMT
For instance, Abraham decided, eventually, to circumcise himself, and within a year his hitherto "barren" wife conceived and gave birth to his son, Isaac. This suggests to me that it wasn't her "barrenness" that caused the difficulty conceiving, but that Abraham had a problem-foreskin, which also caused him a good deal of anguish. And to those who say, "ah, but Abraham had a son, Ishmael, before Isaac, with his wife's slave-girl, Hagar"... call me a cynic but a slave-girl in the situation she was put is going to get pregnant, with whomsoever can get her pregnant. Abraham's wife very clearly, subsequently, had issues with Hagar and her behaviour.
|
|
|
Post by Robin (admin) on Jun 1, 2016 15:38:46 GMT
Alters Phimose ... it is such a common phenomena that the Germans even have a word for it ... old age phimosis In old age together with the general drying and tightening of the skin, fibrotic elements lead to a deterioration of the rings elasticity. Strangely enough it seems to always/often? happen around 70-72 yrs. old one file i really enjoyed writing (among my best writings) was about Abraham and his motives : www.phimosis.cloud/divine_chat.htmlrobin
|
|
ed
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by ed on Jun 4, 2016 19:06:15 GMT
Yes, definitely like your writing about Abraham and his motives, e.g. "and then decide to do it to his children? If he noticed a similar condition in his children and if he was a caring person, he would wish to eliminate this element of chaos in his children". The chaos must have been very fundamental for Abraham. I can empathise with that. But the solution then? And now? And all time in between? Well, the problems with the blanket circumcision solution policy really started with Ahraham's great grandchildren when they got a group to agree to be circumcised then killed them while they were still suffering from the effects of the procedure, i.e. before the scars had healed. So circumcision and foreskins became a weapon and trophy of war or raids, and argument has polarised ever since, waxing and waning. Look at 1 Maccabees 2, for example. That's really extreme! Both ways.
|
|
|
Post by Robin (admin) on Jun 11, 2016 15:00:14 GMT
Hi Ed!
>But the solution then? And now? And all time in between? cant leave questions like that unanswered ...
Routine circ. is NOT the solution these days, i have no question about it, and that has always been my opinion ... especially the modern full circ. op. performed on infants, this obviously causes more problems (anatomical and psycholgical) than it cures. --- I think the traditional partial circ./dorsal slit etc. are very remarkable phenomena but how many new problems they have caused over the centuries with unhygenic treatments etc. is questionable ...
The 20th century routine checking in germany also causes much resentment and fails to check frenulum or relative phimosis, so even "rich" germany doesnt have time to check with the right care attention and patience and many operations are simply "uneducated". --- The only option at this time is education ... and it seems to me that in this time, education is with videos ... at the moment it seems to me, everyone is learning everything through videos!
-------
Now, the basic point for me is how to organise this forum?
In time i hope this forum will have other people questioning the Jewish tradition and the OT stories for you to discuss this specialised area with ... for me the question is how can we index this area of thought ... so that others will find it easily and obviously.
and so i want to experiment - (and maybe this is not what people do on these sorts of forums but) - i want to simply start a new thread whenever the subject goes completely off topic.
the title says here we are discussing : the anti-circ. "decision maker" site (and it seems not possible to change the title on these forums) so i hope its ok with you and i have started a new thread : the Jewish Tradition and Old Testament
cheers - Robin
|
|
ed
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by ed on Jun 15, 2016 21:25:38 GMT
Thanks Robin, yes education is the key. Giving boys the correct anatomical language in sex education classes, and simple line drawings would be a massive start. Then at least they stand a chance of being able to understand and make enquiries about their situation and make informed decisions rather than being left to be hung out to dry by almost universal ignorance. Boys are treated very poorly in these respects. But give them good information and full and balanced advice and options and they're perfectly capable of working things out and making good and right decisions for them. They're not stupid. Videos, well, why not!? The TV programme 'Embarrassing Bodies' gets quite close sometimes but the nub of advice on it has, I've noticed, been quite alarming, insensitive, inadequate, certainly as regards frenulum breve.
Right... onto new threads....
Cheers, Ed
|
|